<mods:mods xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd" version="3.3" xmlns:mods="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"><mods:titleInfo><mods:title>An Analysis of English Classroom Language by EFL&#13;
Teachers at SMPN 4 Muara Bungo</mods:title></mods:titleInfo><mods:name type="personal"><mods:namePart type="given">Monica Sinta</mods:namePart><mods:namePart type="family">Bella</mods:namePart><mods:role><mods:roleTerm type="text">author</mods:roleTerm></mods:role></mods:name><mods:abstract>Most EFL teachers are still unaware of the language they use in the classroom.&#13;
Instead of using English, they prefer to use Bahasa Indonesia and their mother tongue&#13;
in their class. This present research aims to analyse the English classroom language&#13;
used by EFL teachers. It specifically analysed (1) types of English classroom&#13;
language used by EFL teachers, (2) amount of English classroom language used by&#13;
EFL teachers in the teaching and learning process, and (3) EFL teachers‟ reflections&#13;
on their classroom language. The study employed qualitative descriptive research&#13;
with the three teachers of SMPN 4 Muara Bungo as the participants. Observation and&#13;
Stimulated Recall Interview (SRI) were used to conduct the data, and the data were&#13;
analyzed by using Salaberri‟s handbook of classroom language (1995). The result of&#13;
this study showed that teachers spoke six types out of 8 types of classroom language&#13;
suggested by Sallaberi, namely simple instruction, dealing with the language of&#13;
spontaneous situation, the language of social interaction, pair group work, question&#13;
types, and dealing with error. However, the average teacher‟s English classroom&#13;
language use showed a low percentage, which was only 45,4%. Through a stimulated&#13;
recall interview, the teachers admitted that they are still not optimal in providing input&#13;
to the students. It was because of two reasons: (1) students‟ proficiency and (2)&#13;
teachers‟ proficiency themselves. The results of this study proved that EFL teachers&#13;
did not provide comprehensible input to their students.</mods:abstract><mods:classification authority="lcc">P Philology. Linguistics</mods:classification><mods:originInfo><mods:dateIssued encoding="iso8601">2020-11</mods:dateIssued></mods:originInfo><mods:originInfo><mods:publisher>Universitas Negeri Padang;Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris FBS UNP</mods:publisher></mods:originInfo><mods:genre>Thesis</mods:genre></mods:mods>